Thursday, March 14, 2013

History? Ken Loach's film is more like Marxist fantasy

History? Ken Loach's film is more like Marxist fantasy

By Chris Tookey

|

 The Spirit of 45 (U)  

Verdict: Ken at his worst

Rating:  Star Rating

Ken Loach is an admirable film-maker who’s created movies of rare quality and humanity, but he’s always been weakest â€" and least popular â€" when he’s allowed his hardline political agenda to dominate.

His new, sternly partisan history lesson about the 1945 Labour government may go down a storm with George Galloway, but it’s unlikely to have anyone else queuing round the block.

This is not so much a documentary as a barking mad Marxist fantasy.

Ken Loach's new, sternly partisan history lesson about the 1945 Labour government may go down a storm with George Galloway

Ken Loach's new, sternly partisan history lesson about the 1945 Labour government may go down a storm with George Galloway

It’s said that history is written by the victorious, but history in the British cinema continues to be misrepresented by those on the long-disgraced extreme Left.

Taxpayers’ and lottery money has been squandered on a film that allows no alternative view to the doctrine that socialism is brilliant, and nationalisation the only efficient and humane way of organising industry.

Loach uses ultra-conservative film-making methods â€" such as talking heads and an all-white cast â€" to blame everything bad that’s happened since 1979 on Margaret Thatcher. Who knew that she was responsible for the decline of the mining and steel industries around the globe?

The comically parochial, dogmatically blinkered Mr Loach is uninterested in why socialism and state-directed enterprises really failed, and often led to the worst kinds of totalitarian repression.

Most of the domestic policies Ken favours were last presented to the British public in Michael Foot’s 1983 general election manifesto, accurately described by former Labour minister Gerald Kaufman as ‘the longest suicide note in history’.

Thirty years after that electoral catastrophe, the one reason to welcome this film is that it reveals more clearly than anything else the backward-looking, scarily obsessive, extreme political agenda of those who subsidise films in Britain â€" and, indeed, those who ‘criticise’ them, for I guarantee that this will receive the most respectful reviews of any release this week.

This will rank among the most deeply depressing movies of 2013, but not for the reasons Ken and his acolytes intend.

No comments:

Post a Comment